Mediabids' mention in Niche Magazine's "Niched Out" Newsletter. Available here

SUCCESS STORY OF THE MONTH

Rapid River Arts & Culture Flourishes with Mediabids Rapid River Arts and Culture magazine has used Mediabids Per-Inquiry advertising for several years. According to Publisher Dennis Ray, the ads themselves helped make the magazine look more successful, full, and professional, while helping them track readers’ needs by the types of ads they most respond to and when. Per-inquiry advertising enables Rapid River Arts and Culture to run ads from national advertisers and get paid based on the response the ad generates in their magazine; payouts currently range from $6 per call to $900 a sale. The companies Mediabids Per-Inquiry advertising has are well-known, well-respected national businesses. Dennis has even received emails from readers thanking him for bringing to their attention a product or service they found through a Mediabids ad. He likes their customer service, too - a check from Mediabids Per-Inquiry had gotten ripped in half in the mail and they had a replacement check in a couple days. "I have only positive things to say about Mediabids Per-Inquiry advertising and their staff," he says.

Mediabids works with Marchex on a few per-inquiry advertising campaigns, so if you are a publication who runs PI ads, you may have contributed to their success. 

Marchex Harnesses the Power of the Call

Written on

May 13, 2010 

Author

Gavin Dunaway  |

ADOTAS – So I’m walking along, minding my own business, when suddenly my iPhone starts making a weird sound — kinda like a marimba. It’s not the sound for a text message, Facebook update or a new email, so I’m a little frightened. After I slink it out of my pocket, I’m confused when the screen says, “Incoming call.”

A phone call? Wha? People still make them in the age of clicks and texts?

They certainly do, and Marchex has found that inbound phone calls convert at five times the rate of clicks. No wonder the company has launched a pay-for-call exchange, a performance-based call advertising service.

Marchex believes the pay-for-call market is about to explode due to the huge digital supply on a wealth of platforms and innovations in technology that cost-effectively serve, track, optimize and filter phone calls. In addition, advertisers can now glean far more user information from calls including geographic and demographic data.

The pay-for-call exchange — which spreads across 50 offline, online and mobile publisher partnerships — provides both campaign creation tools and call-filtering technologies. In beta testing, average call conversions ranged from 20% to 30% while consumer engagement on the phone averaged more than eight minutes.

If the last decade of digital marketing revolved around online conversions via clicks, Marchex believes the next 10 will revolve around driving conversions through calls.

“Pay-for-call advertising is the natural next step in the evolution of performance media,” said Marchex Chief Operating Officer Pete Christothoulou. “It is the last mile for advertisers, literally connecting them to their prospective customers through the phone. Each iteration of advertising products and business models — from pay-per-view to pay-per-click to pay-per-conversation — brings advertisers closer to customers and the actual transaction while increasing efficiency and ROI.”

If you're looking for a brief overview of per-inquiry print advertising, the video below from Mediabids' President Jedd Gould may be helpful: 

Mediabids is pleased to announce its first Per-Inquiry Print Advertising Challenge, running from April 1 – April 30, 2010. This challenge is open to individual weekly newspapers that participate in their Per-Inquiry Print Advertising program that wish to run a DISH Network print ad in their publication throughout the month of April. Each weekly newspaper will be compensated according to the traditional per-inquiry payout structure for DISH’s Network’s PI Campaign with Mediabids – they will receive $13 for each unique 60-second call generated from the ad in their publication.

The weekly newspaper that generates the most response to the DISH network ad for the month of April will receive a check for $5,000 from Mediabids, in addition to the amount generated by their newspaper. Response will be tracked by a third-party call-tracking service, and results will be updated weekly on the website http://www.mediabids.com/marketing/contest.html Publication’s names will not be revealed but the location and circulation of the top ten publications will be made public. The winner of the contest will be announced May 3, 2010.

For more information, or to enter your publication into the contest, please visit http://www.mediabids.com/marketing/contest.html

This speech was given by Jedd Gould, of Mediabids, to the Suburban Newspaper Association and Southern Newspaper Publishers Association's Strategic Revenue Summit yesterday.

Advertiser's Expectations Have Changed, So Should You

10 years ago Mediabids launched and we have been doing per-response advertising in addition to our conventional online marketplace sales for the past 4 years.

I have been asked to speak a little bit about response-based advertising and there are specific methods that we have developed at Mediabids to handle the demand we have for per-response advertising in print. Not all of these may be right for your publication but here is how we do it:

-          We typically work with advertisers who are willing to pay for an unlimited amount of response.

-          Response is typically defined as a call, a web visit or a text.

-          Response based advertising is heavily reliant upon tracking of the response generated by an ad. At Mediabids we got into charging advertisers on a per response basis because we saw the need for tracking and better understanding the results that print ads were generating.  

-          Every ad that we place has a unique identifier, so we know what each publication is generating.

o   In 2009 we placed 66,350 per response ads for more than 500,000 total insertions.

o   Every single ad we placed had a unique phone number.

o    We then track using the data generated from 800 numbers to determine what a publication is owed.

o   Advertisers typically pay based on either a per-call or per-sale basis and the amounts vary depending on the type of product and the anticipated volume.

-          We give publications the choice of which advertisers they want to run, we resize the ad to their specifications, insert the unique phone number or url, upload it to the website where the publication can download it and then track the response.

-          As some of you may know, most 800#s are really transparent pass-throughs, allowing you to get the information on the caller and then point the call to wherever the advertiser wants the phone to ring.

-          Because we are not depending on the advertiser to provide us data on tracking, we know that the information we use to measure results and then pay publications is accurate.

Per-response advertising accounts for a small portion of what Mediabids does. We are primarily a marketplace for print in which advertising is bought and sold conventionally, in that advertisers pay for space.

However, what we have learned through per-response has influenced everything we do.

From what has gone on in the marketplace over the past 10 years, it is pretty clear that advertiser’s expectations have shifted faster than publications. However, despite what you may read or even hear at times at a conference like this, there is a lot of reason to be hopeful about the future because fundamentally print works. It is important to keep in mind that advertisers don’t love Google or Yahoo because they have some affinity to search based advertising. They spend billions with these two companies because they deliver measurable response.

At Mediabids we have about 17,000 advertisers who use our website to buy ads and in most cases they are spending more in print today than they did 10 years ago. They are not spending more because we are particularly good at selling (as evidenced by my dynamic speaking style), they are spending more because print delivers results and we can prove it.

Suggestion #1: If you are going to talk to advertisers about response you have to have confidence in your product.

Advertisers never tell publications that their advertising works. Your sales reps, people with years of experience, could probably count on one hand the number of times they have walked into an advertiser’s business or called them on the phone and had that advertiser tell them their ad was working well. The problem is that advertisers might be right, they might be wrong. But no one really knows. The tracking methods that advertisers use are weak. The person answering the phone who is supposed to remember to ask – how did you hear about us? Is not a tracking mechanism.  

This constant state of rejection and negotiation creates a type of institutional insecurity. The result is that many people who work at publications seem to have a sneaking suspicion that their product just does not work because, in most cases, that is what their advertisers are telling them- not showing them mind you, telling them.

If you are going to compete with products like Google and Yahoo, you have to believe your publication can generate results and work to make that happen. You have to understand your readers, their demographics and how that overlays on your advertisers’ products, goods or services.

Suggestion #2: acknowledge that advertisers have changed the rules

Google and Yahoo have let the genie out of the bottle. Advertising is no longer about a real estate style approach to a page  – getting an ad on a good page where people will see it – advertising for most companies is now about response, advertising for the sake of a brand is increasingly obsolete for large and small companies and everyday that goes by it becomes more obsolete. This is true in all mediums. Radio, television and the internet are all mediums which have adopted per-response based models and succeeded with them.

If print continues to suffer, it won’t be because of circulation or because publications cannot figure out a way to monetize content or their websites or deliver the product electronically in a compelling way. If print continues to decline it will be because publications still think they are selling real estate in an age when no one wants to buy. Google and Yahoo do not sell real estate, they sell response and results. Selling space against response to a group of advertisers who do not know how to track their own response is a very difficult thing to do.

I am not suggesting that per response is the only hope, in the sense that advertisers should only pay for the response that is generated. Advertisers have changed the rules, because they have changed their expectations.

Whether you use a per call, per sale or charge for space in a conventional manner, you are selling space to advertisers who now care more about the response they are generating than the benefits of branding. Every time someone buys an ad, there is an expectation of response and, unfortunately, most publications don’t have the tools in place to show advertisers how their ads are working.  When advertising works and you can prove it, how you charge is irrelevant. The method of the monetization is academic.

Suggestion #3: Own your data

If publications are going to thrive in the future they must take ownership of the results generated by their product. This is the biggest difference between newspapers and online offerings like Google and Yahoo.

Compare for a moment two mediums - online and print:

With Google’s Adwords an advertiser has real time access to how much money they have spent, how many clicks they have generated and with a simple software install, how many sales the clicks have resulted in. A quick calculation can determine definitively whether those ads are paying for themselves.

Now think about what an advertiser in a daily newspaper does to try to figure out how an ad is working.  A shocking number of advertisers, who are incredibly sophisticated in measuring other mediums, depend on the same devices that were available to them in the 1950s – coupons…  or worse, asking the customer why they called. If you have ever had the misfortune to listen to phone calls, you know that the average American consumer either is uncomfortable answering this question or has an astonishingly short memory, because few people know. In fact, an advertiser we work with did a test where they asked their operator to give the caller 5 choices of where an advertiser heard about a print ad– 4 real publications where their ad appeared and 1 completely fictitious publication. The fake publication outperformed 2 of the real ones.

Advertisers need to be provided the tools to understand how their ads are performing, regardless of whether they are paying per-response, per-sale, or for space.

Tracking for print should not be something left to the advertiser.

1)      Data is valuable. It can be used in so many ways.

2)      Conventional ad selling is, in large part, a negotiation and data is a very compelling selling tool.

3)      Advertisers are bad at collecting this response data themselves and should not be entrusted with this job. Left to their own devices they rarely track results effectively. Mediabids works with more than 17,000 advertisers and there might be 1% who track effectively on their own.

The problem is that when advertisers don’t track, they suspect the worst. We see this first hand – I started Mediabids 10 years ago because I wanted to figure out a way to sell print ads using the tools available through the internet. Thousands of advertisers use our site to buy print ads and four years ago we started to look into why many of these advertisers were increasing their budgets online and decreasing them in print.

The answer was very clear. Our advertisers were not making any effort to track on their own, we were not providing them with any tools and therefore most of the objections to spending we heard centered around the “my  ad is not working” argument. Nothing to back it up, no data, no proof – just a gut feel, the ad isn’t working.

Mediabids got into per-response advertising because we got into tracking.

Like everyone in this room, at Mediabids we knew- on some level - that print worked but we didn’t have any data, we couldn’t back it up, we were as insecure as our publication clients about results. The problem was.. that we really didn’t have a choice – we were really already selling response based advertising without any way of validating the response.

I say that we were selling response based advertising because that is what our advertisers thought they were buying – we were just doing a bad job selling. Because we were selling space, not results. Advertisers were spending money- paying for space - with little concern on our part (Mediabids) or the publicaations’ about the response that was being generated.

Today we track everything in both response-based ads and conventional ads.

What we have learned presents a much different picture than what you have heard about print recently. Here are a few common denominators of the results across advertisers:

-          Print is working

-          The leads generated by print are almost always more valuable than any other medium. More valuable than radio, television or the internet.

-          The ROI of print is almost always higher than other mediums.

-          The close rate on leads generated by print is better than other mediums.

-          The customer retention rate is better: The customers acquired via print tend to be better educated about the products they are buying and therefore are longer-lasting customers.

But Mediabids’ advertisers only know this because we show them and showing them has been worthwhile. In 2009 our revenue nearly tripled after doubling in 2008. Most of our advertisers, who represent a wide cross-section of business types and geographical focuses, spend more today on print than they did 10 years ago because we can show them it works.

Please know, I am happy to get into greater detail of the mechanics of how this is done later.

As I said earlier, Google and Yahoo let the genie out of the bottle and recalibrated advertisers’ expectations but that does not mean that print cannot adapt and succeed by incorporating some basic tracking and measurement devices. In some cases that may lead to a per-response deal. In other cases, a conventional ad sale. But in all cases, we have found at Mediabids, the more data a company has on the response generated by its ad, the more likely they are to feel like their money is being spent wisely.

This article in AdAge on how Google is testing a set fee payment model on search advertising should shake up publishers. For the past three years, Mediabids has been offering per-response advertising in addition to our conventional ad sales. Right now thousands of publications use our per-response ads to augment their revenue streams. If anypublishers still think that pay-per-response is not a payment model that they will have to contend with in the future, think again. Google's test shows that even the most local advertisers will have this as an option in the near future in other mediums. If print is going to compete it has to adopt the payment model that advertisers feel comfortable with, learn more about our per-response program at www.mediabids.com.

Google Lures Local Advertisers by Subverting Its Own Search Policies

Two-City Test Takes on Yellow Pages With New Pricing System, Ad Model

by Michael Learmonth
Published: October 07, 2009